In the midst of the general global hysteria about achievements in the field of artificial intelligence, I would like to reduce the excitement somewhat, normalize the degree, putting AI in its place in history and remove excessive excitement from the befuddling “new” opportunities offered by Westerners to the robbed and driven from fertile lands into the electronic desert (all the paradisiacal gardens and the delights of wildlife are transferred to the virtual the world of an iron box and a saucepan with VR glasses put on your head) to the world, according to the principle of a plucked stupid chicken.
Scientists warn us that a person can get results that are completely unexpected for him, because neural networks are not a model of the human brain, but are a computer-friendly form of representation of the mechanism of some (possibly hostile) intelligence.
The results may be inhuman or anti-human.
Computers enable the ultra-fast destruction of people by clicking or by signal or by disabling the signal. AI helps certain forces to impose on a person precisely computer-based (binary, digital 16 bits, 32 bits, 64 bits), i.e. not living thinking (living thinking operates on universal dimensions with an infinite number of decimal places).
Computer thinking cannot create new forms of knowledge, unlike living thinking, but it can solve mathematical problems faster, which are also artificial, because they were created to justify the future computer civilization. A person solves quite complex tasks every second without thinking and without spending significant energy, because living thinking goes far beyond the human body and connects a person with all the worlds in the universe, which is impossible to implement in the computer world due to the order of complexity of such a task. The idea of the similarity of human and computer thinking was based initially on the discovered ability of a computer to play checkers and chess almost like a human. However, the person turned out to be not so simple in his original version, and the computer had to increase power all the time, i.e. change it.
Another example is decision-making during a military battle. The decisions of famous generals delight us precisely for their unpredictability in conditions of lack of resources. On the example of computer games, on the contrary, the resource approach to solving such tasks prevails in AI, which distinguishes human and machine thinking very significantly. It should also be noted that the commander made decisions sitting in a tent in the rain, and often did not have accurate information about upcoming maneuvers and enemy forces. An AI-based computer program will not be able to make a decision in such conditions without uploading complete data on the capabilities of both opposing sides. That is, vivid thinking allows you to solve problems intuitively, drawing solutions beyond the human brain, possibly rummaging through the layers of information accumulated by Mother Earth over the past millions of years.
Computerization of human thinking is beneficial only to beings who have developed the left hemisphere of the brain, because then they will surpass humans, having developed logical thinking. However, a person with a lively mindset is incomprehensible to them and therefore scary, because he and his actions cannot be calculated. This is what has always allowed Russian soldiers to defeat the digital warriors of Rome and the West, who acted according to instructions and commands when it was forbidden to violate discipline and make decisions on the situation. The Cossacks’ unlimited and exuberant freedom of action in battle, often misunderstood by the Cossacks themselves, led the enemy to simultaneously amaze, stupor and a state of panic before the endless ingenuity and resourcefulness of the Russian soldiers. This is an example of living thinking, when decisions are made outside the human body and the body begins to be controlled by other forces that fill the surrounding space (ether).
Unfortunately, modern approaches in the army are pro-Western, which was laid down by the tsars of the Romanov dynasty, which means that we have become vulnerable to Westerners, because their logic and prudence are more developed, and we play by their rules.
The forces behind AI are openly trying to compare humans and AI, trying in every possible way to show that AI is supposedly superior to humans in various sectors of the national economy.
But is such a comparison legitimate, and what is it all about? It’s like comparing a forester and a plant scientist (botany). They will have different worldviews. A botanist knows an incredible number of Latin plant names, while a forester can describe the plant world in such a way that a botanist will listen with his mouth open. This is a good example of the difference between live thinking and Latinized digital thinking. The same thing can be observed on the street. Sometimes a simple villager can express such deep thoughts (lively thinking, because humans live in nature), which confuses urban academics (they live in an artificial illusory world, just like AI).
Since AI is being created by academics in the Western world who have declared war on the forces of nature, living thinking is alien and beyond their control. Accordingly, their invention is just as alien to people with lively thinking.
Someone has already been happy – AI will help me think less. But someone else will notice – and why do I need AI, because I have my own head on my shoulders. Therefore, you should not create a new god out of AI, otherwise the result may be even worse than in the science fiction films Prometheus, Dune, Boys in the Universe, and Combat Robot No. 4.
AI should become just a part of the tools used in practice – one of many, but nothing more. We must not allow AI tricks to replace the real world by immersing ourselves in the virtual world, so as not to become a slave to AI, which will use people for its scientific purposes, sometimes incompatible with the concept of humanity.
If the Creator wanted to create an AI, he would not have created a human, but would have created a smart stone capable of modifying the space around him. However, this is not the case, which means that a person with AI is not on the path, since a person is a carrier of living thinking, which is necessary for the Creator to improve and beautify the world, create wonders of the world, and not millions of pieces of the same type of smartphones.
One should not forget that it was the living human mind that was able to develop such a primitive technology as a binary computer. It was people who figured out how to adapt these poor, unviable accounts and make something more fulfilling out of them. Therefore, let’s sing the praises of the human genius, and let the AI take its place in the toolbox.
In the living world of the Creator, any living organism is only a projection of complex structures from other dimensions, i.e., thus, any living organism is protected from “hacking” by extraneous forces. All they can see is the body of a living organism, but they can’t really see how it works. Hence, it turns out that everything that is created by man is the creation of his hands, and such objects do not come from the Creator’s world, which means they are obviously objects of a lower level that have no connection with other dimensions. These are simply mechanical devices that can analyze only the visible part of the universe, which is orders of magnitude less complex than the models and rules describing it in other dimensions. That is why for a Western scientist who denies God, and even more so the complexity of the Creator’s world and its multilayeredness, there is no way to understand the structure of the Universe in all its diversity, which, of course, can be done by a living mind that understands the Creator not through words, but through direct contact through its other bodies, and not only through the prism of an exclusively materialistic method. cognition (breaking down and seeing what’s inside is a small child’s sandbox method). That is why a living Russian person is incomprehensible to the narrow mind of the West, he is scary and inexplicable to him, because The West cannot calculate it, which means it cannot find weak points for harm.
A lively mind allows you to understand the essence of things without breaking them, but presenting options for how this can be done or improved. Therefore, an AI based on the ideas of materialism will always be a junior high school student compared to a person with a lively mind. Perhaps that’s why the good Electronics engineer was a schoolboy (and his creator, Professor Gromov, was an elderly man with a lively mind), unlike the Western version of the Terminator Destroyer.
By certain forces, the world is increasingly plunging into the abyss of crime, which is becoming more powerful and inaccessible with the new capabilities of AI. How will a policeman behave in relation to a virtual criminal robbing thousands of real people every hour? Will a virtual policeman be developed? What will banks do with massive thefts of customer card data using “hacked” AI employees? What will happen to the accounts of large companies if criminals use AI to wipe out all their accounts? What will a business do when AI employees forward all confidential information to competitors from abroad?
Yes, with the help of AI, all this is possible. And in the very near future.
AI allows you to wage competitive wars and cyber wars, acting unnoticed by the enemy at high speed, because the data transmission networks used in common use are already approaching 1 GB/sec, even in ordinary apartments, which allows you to steal data very quickly.
This is the price for the short-term delight of this AI thing. And what do you think AI was designed for then? Ask who is sponsoring developments in this area? First of all, secret private banking structures scattered around the world, then the special services of foreign countries, and only then the military and business (the target of the attack). It’s not for nothing that AI is built as a set of agents run by clients – after all, instances of such agents can be easily modified on the fly, erasing it and replacing it with a new one with new code. Now you don’t need to hack the bank – the AI employee will open any lock himself, pick up the key. Moreover, it can be a full-time AI employee (after all, the person was fired because he received a salary, saved).
This is the essence of this new global-scale scam. Citizens, keep your money in a three-liter jar.
In conclusion, I would like to wish that in the hour of temptation, people make the right choice on which side they should be on – on the side of the capitalist-materialist-destroyers of everything around them or on the side of the Creator, the Creator, who creates countless new worlds and endows man with vast riches of knowledge of himself and the world around him.